Rings

NOTE:
MetaGame is an ever-evolving crypto community effort.

Absolutely NOTHING on this wiki is final. If you have better ideas on how the MetaGame should be structured and work, feel free to suggest edits here or through Telegram.

tl;dr - I'm just thinking out loud here, and could use constructive as well as destructive feedback.

Rings of MetaGame
Rings are collectives of usually "expert" players urgently aligning and setting path for solving big problems or making the big picture goals happen.

They are different than: Example of a successful ring: Template:
 * Guilds - because they mostly appear when a) big problem needs to be solved, b) great vision needs to be fulfilled, by coordinating a large number of guilds rather than through creation of a new guild.
 * Raid parties - basically because they prequel them. They set paths for many raid parties.
 * Meta transactions

The first set of delegates for the execution of the chosen path are set in the first session. They take it as their duty to run the mission to completion and stake their rep on it.

They are then the CEO of the mission until the ring decides they're past their usefulness which can be due to: The KPIs - They are always set on the first session, unless the matter requires more research; in which case the delivering of research results is the key performance indicator.
 * The fact he's utterly incompetent
 * The mission is completed
 * He delivered good KPIs but he's no longer the right player.

The ring (and other service providers) then act as mentors to the chosen executioners. If the task requires a lot of money, he is helped through the process of proposal crafting etc.

He delivers the promise or is forked and his rep slashed.

The rings are usually costly to initiate because they often require attention from some of the masterminds and grand wizards of the MetaGame, but the payback is epic.